The New York Times says OpenAI removed evidence from its copyright lawsuit
Astronomer Stephen Hawking told us Last week Tonight’s John Oliver is an interesting but memorable fictional story from a decade ago about the potential dangers of AI. The premise is that a group of scientists build a very intelligent computer and ask it, “Is there a God?” The computer replies, “It’s on now” and the lightning bolts around the plug preventing it from closing. Let’s hope that’s not the case with OpenAI and other missing evidence from New York Times’ a case of cheating.
It has strings reported that the court declaration filed by New York Times On Wednesday he said OpenAI developers accidentally deleted evidence of AI training data that took a long time to research and compile. OpenAI also found some data but the “actual file names and folder structure” that show when the AI copied its articles to its models has not yet been found.
OpenAI spokesperson Jason Deutrom disagrees The NYT’s claims and says the company will “send our response soon.” I Times has been fighting Microsoft and OpenAI over alleged copyright infringement with its AI models since December last year.
The case is still in its discovery phase where evidence is sought and presented by both sides to build their case for trial. OpenAI had to transfer its training data to Times but has yet to publicly disclose the exact information it used to develop the AI methods.
Instead, OpenAI created a “sandbox” of two virtual machines to The NYTThe legal team can do their own research. I The NYT’s a legal team spent more than 150 hours sifting through data from one of the devices before the data was removed. OpenAI agreed to the removal but the company’s legal team called it a “problem.” Although OpenAI developers tried to fix the bug, the data returned was missing The NYT’s work. This led The NYT to recreate everything from scratch. I The NYT’s attorneys said they had no reason to believe the removal was intentional.
Source link